Darwinism requires MACROevolution to be proven. Where are the transitional fossils that prove a reptile evolved into an Archaeopteryx? There aren't any, because the Archaeopteryx isn't evolved. Why aren't there ape men today? Why are all animals well defined, instead of in a state of confusion, anatomically speaking? Charles Darwin said, that was one of the problems that hurt his 'theory'.

Since evolution can't be proved with transitional fossils, such as reptiles evolving into Archaoepteryxes, and some land animal evolving into a whale, their only hope is to dupe the public into accepting variations within species as proof.

A bunch of scam artists and hoaxters.

Great introduction to the problem of species. Sums everything up well using examples.

Variations isn't proof for evolution. To prove evolution, you would need more than variation and adaptation. The salamanders are still salamanders, the warblers are still warblers, the gulls are still gulls, etc.

Make a video as soon as you have real proof that a lizard evolved into a bird, or a cow-like creature evolved into a whale, or a dog-like creature evolved into a dolphin, etc.